History is a fantastic teacher. Our past experiences, no matter what sphere of human endeavour they may be a part of, are rich in lessons that subsequent generations can study and learn from. The problem, as I have written many times before, is that we are poor students. We have short memories and attention spans. We believe that the only true experiences are those that happen to us immediately and directly, or to others within our narrow sphere of existence. If it doesn't happen to me, my family, or my friends, it isn't real.
In the current battle against the covid virus, we had up until a month ago tricked ourselves into believing that we had it licked. The reality is that the omicron variant has wreaked havoc on our health care system, our outlook on the virus, our habits, our day-to-day activities and business, our schools and our manner of reporting the news events concerning the pandemic. And, as a consequence, our leaders have fallen victim to a type of paralysis in decision making that defies credulity.
In the American Civil War, a similar situation presented itself to Abraham Lincoln, the president of the US at the time of the southern insurrection. Lincoln had every intention of fighting the war because he believed that the secession of the southern states was illegal, and that the very survival of the republic founded "four-score" years prior depended on a Union victory. Lincoln was single-minded about the prosecution of the war, and was determined to win. But the problem was that the people he put in charge of the Union armies in the earliest stages of the war didn't share his optimism or determination to win.
One by one, Union generals were put in command of key components of the Union army. And, time after time, they fought their southern rivals to, at best, stalemate after stalemate or, at worst, complete and utter defeat. The southern generals had more to lose than their Union counterparts, to be sure, but the hesitance, the risk-averse attitude, and the uncertainty of Union generals like McClellan, Meade, Pope, Hooker ( who at least was willing to give battle to the southern forces, earning him the nickname "Fighting Joe Hooker" ) and Burnside ( whose main claim to fame was lending a version of his last name to the practice of men growing out their side whiskers, or "sideburns" ) created a stumbling and unsuccessful series of campaigns that drove Lincoln to frustration.
Pope |
Meade |
McClellan |
Hooker |
No comments:
Post a Comment